{"created":"2024-02-19T09:24:11.756343+00:00","id":43642,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"46b9347f-b0fc-485f-8cba-894cbaf0b7a2"},"_deposit":{"id":"43642","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"43642"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:jdcat.jsps.go.jp:00043642","sets":["1613031614318"]},"author_link":[],"item_1551264308487":{"attribute_name":" タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1551255647225":"本人訴訟に関する調査，2011","subitem_1551255648112":"ja"},{"subitem_1551255647225":"Survey on Personal Lawsuits, 2011","subitem_1551255648112":"en"}]},"item_1551264629907":{"attribute_name":"Lisence","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602213569986":"https://csrda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/access/condition/","subitem_1602213570623":"ja"},{"subitem_1602213569986":"https://csrda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/access/condition/","subitem_1602213570623":"en"}]},"item_1551264822581":{"attribute_name":"Topic","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1592472785169":"立法と法制度","subitem_1592472785698":"ja","subitem_1592472786088":"CESSDATopic","subitem_1592472786560":"https://vocabularies.cessda.eu/urn/urn:ddi:int.cessda.cv:TopicClassification"},{"subitem_1592472785169":"Legislation and legal systems","subitem_1592472785698":"en","subitem_1592472786088":"CESSDATopic","subitem_1592472786560":"https://vocabularies.cessda.eu/urn/urn:ddi:int.cessda.cv:TopicClassification"}]},"item_1551264846237":{"attribute_name":"Desc","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1551255577890":"本調査は，いわゆる本人訴訟の実態について，客観的・実証的に把握することを目的として実施された。本人訴訟については，裁判官の個別の経験に基づく個人的なエピソードによる印象論をもって語られる傾向が強く，この傾向がその正確な実態把握を妨げてきたという指摘がなされてきた。また個人的エピソードに基づく議論では，個別の論点が相互の関連性をもたないかたちで提示されるという問題もある。例えば，ある議論では本人訴訟がその負担感という観点から語られ，別の議論では裁判所の後見的機能と結びつけて語られてきた。\n\n 　本調査では，本人訴訟の実態について客観的に把握するという観点から，印象や感覚の影響の少ない事項について客観的質問を中核としつつも，必要に応じて一部の質問項目では裁判官から見た印象や主観的評価を尋ねるという調査設計をとった。また，本調査では，裁判所が後見的に関与する必要がある事件ないし審理において，ある種の負担を裁判所に感じさせる事件や審理の実態を明らかにするという問題関心から，調査の対象事件について選定条件を定めた上で（「調査対象」の項目を参照）調査を実施している。","subitem_1551255592625":"ja"},{"subitem_1551255577890":"This survey was carried out with the aim of objectively and empirically understanding the actual status of so-called pro se representation. When it comes to pro se representation, there is a strong tendency for judges to offer personal, episodic, and impressionistic stories of cases. It has been pointed out that this tendency has obstructed our ability to accurately understand the actual status of these cases. Additionally, arguments based on anecdotal accounts can be problematic when they involve points unrelated to each other. For example, one argument might be given from the perspective of the burden of pro se representation, while another might be told in connection to the stewardship function of the court itself.For this survey, our aim is to objectively understand the actual status of pro se representation; we have therefore centered our survey around objective questions that are about matters less influenced by impressions and emotions. However, we have made allowances for a small number of question items that poll the impressions and subjective evaluations of judges. Additionally, for this survey, we first finalized the selection conditions (refer to \"survey targets\") for target cases—cases in which the court's involvement as a steward or guardian became necessary, cases which caused the court to feel a certain burden during the trial, as well as cases which enable us to get a better understanding of the trial process itself—before carrying out the survey.","subitem_1551255592625":"en"}]},"item_1551264917614":{"attribute_name":"publisher","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1551255702686":"SSJデータアーカイブ","subitem_1551255710277":"ja"},{"subitem_1551255702686":"SSJDA","subitem_1551255710277":"en"}]},"item_1551265002099":{"attribute_name":"Lang","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1551255818386":"jpn"}]},"item_1551265075370":{"attribute_name":"Version","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1591254915406":"ja"}]},"item_1570068313185":{"attribute_name":"Geo","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1586419454219":"日本","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"Japan","subitem_1586419462229":"en"}]},"item_1586157591881":{"attribute_name":"Study ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1586156939407":"0874","subitem_1586311767281":"ja","subitem_1591256665864":"SSJデータアーカイブ"},{"subitem_1586156939407":"10.34500/SSJDA.0874","subitem_1586311767281":"ja","subitem_1591256665864":"DOI"},{"subitem_1586156939407":"0874","subitem_1586311767281":"en","subitem_1591256665864":"SSJDA"}]},"item_1586253152753":{"attribute_name":"Date of C","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602144573160":"2011-01-20","subitem_1602144578572":"ja","subitem_1602144587621":"start"},{"subitem_1602144573160":"2011-01-31","subitem_1602144578572":"ja","subitem_1602144587621":"end"}]},"item_1586253224033":{"attribute_name":"UoA","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1596608607860":"個人","subitem_1596608609366":"ja"},{"subitem_1596608607860":"その他","subitem_1596608609366":"ja"},{"subitem_1596608607860":"Individual","subitem_1596608609366":"en"},{"subitem_1596608607860":"Other","subitem_1596608609366":"en"}]},"item_1586253249552":{"attribute_name":"Universe","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1596608974429":"【地裁】\n 対象裁判官: 全国の地方裁判所（本庁及び各支部）の民事単独訴訟事件を担当する裁判官の全員\n 対象事件: 実質的紛争のある本人訴訟の分析という目的に沿って，次の(a)～(d)の4つの要件を満たす事件のみを対象事件とした。\n(a) 口頭弁論期日（判決言渡期日を除く）が3回以上の事件，または，1回でも弁論準備手続に付された事件\n(b) 当事者の一方または双方について，本人訴訟である事件\n(c) 地方裁判所における民事単独訴訟事件のうち，過払金返還請求事件，公営住宅（都市再生機構を含む）の建物明渡請求事件および奨学金返還請求事件を除いた事件\n(d) 2011年1月20日～31日までの期間に終了した事件\n\n 【高裁】\n 対象裁判官: 全国の高等裁判所（本庁及び各支部）の民事訴訟控訴事件を主任として担当する陪席裁判官の全員\n 対象事件: 2011年1月20日～31日までの期間に終了した事件，原審における審理が，前記(a)(b)(c)の要件を満たす事件\n\n※なお，【地裁】も【高裁】のいずれのデータについても，上に述べた対象事件の定義により，たとえ本人訴訟であっても，（実質的紛争がない事案などように）弁論準備手続きに付されることなく，1～2回の口頭弁論で結審する事案については，調査の対象とはなっていない。","subitem_1596608975087":"ja"},{"subitem_1596608974429":"[District courts]Target judges: all judges in charge of independent civil cases in district courts nationwide (headquarters and branches)Target cases: In accordance with our objective of analyzing pro se representation on substantive disputes, we selected only those cases which fulfilled requirements (a) through (d) below.(a) Cases with more than 3 oral argument days (excluding verdict delivery days) or cases where argument preparation procedures were carried out at least once.(b) Cases where at least one side used pro se representation.(c) Independent civil cases from district courts, excluding cases involving claims of refunds following overpayment, claims requesting eviction from public housing (including the Urban Renaissance Agency), and claims of refund of scholarship money.(d) Cases that ended between January 20 and 31, 2011.[High courts]Target judges: All sitting judges in charge of civil appeal cases in high courts nationwide (headquarters and branches).Target cases: Cases that ended between January 20-31, 2011, and those that met the original case requirements (a), (b), and (c) above.* Furthermore, with regard to our data items for both district and high courts, and in accordance with our previously given definition of \"target cases,\" we did not take as target cases those which involved pro se representation but did not involve argument preparation procedures or were concluded within 1-2 days (such as those that did not involve substantive disputes).","subitem_1596608975087":"en"}]},"item_1586253334588":{"attribute_name":"Sampling P","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1596609826487":"非確率: 有意抽出","subitem_1596609827068":"ja"},{"subitem_1596609826487":"Non-probability: Purposive","subitem_1596609827068":"en"}]},"item_1586253349308":{"attribute_name":"CollM","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1596610501381":"ja"}]},"item_1586253589529":{"attribute_name":"Sampling R","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1596609826487":"【地裁】285件 （ただし提供データは288件）\n 【高裁】47件","subitem_1596609827068":"ja"},{"subitem_1596609826487":"[District courts]285 cases (However, 288 cases have been provided)[High courts] 47 cases","subitem_1596609827068":"en"}]},"item_1588260046718":{"attribute_name":"Data K","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1591178807921":"量的調査: ミクロデータ","subitem_1591178808409":"ja","subitem_1592380784883":"Other"},{"subitem_1591178807921":"quantitative research: micro data","subitem_1591178808409":"en","subitem_1592380784883":"Other"}]},"item_1588260178185":{"attribute_name":"Access_e","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1522650717957":"ja","subitem_1522650727486":"制約付きアクセス"},{"subitem_1522650717957":"en","subitem_1522650727486":"restricted access"}]},"item_1592405734122":{"attribute_name":"Distributor","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1591320889728":"SSJDA","subitem_1591320890384":"Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo","subitem_1591320914113":"https://csrda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ssjda/","subitem_1591320918354":"Distributor","subitem_1592369405220":"SSJ データアーカイブ","subitem_1592369407829":"ja"},{"subitem_1591320889728":"SSJDA","subitem_1591320890384":"Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo","subitem_1591320914113":"https://csrda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/ssjda/","subitem_1591320918354":"Distributor","subitem_1592369405220":"SSJDA","subitem_1592369407829":"en"}]},"item_1592405735401":{"attribute_name":"Related P","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602214559588":"ja","subitem_1602214560358":"https://ssjda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Direct/resultsearch.php?lang=jpn&eid=0874"},{"subitem_1602214559588":"en","subitem_1602214560358":"https://ssjda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Direct/resultsearch.php?lang=eng&eid=0874"}]},"item_1592880868902":{"attribute_name":"Bib","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1586228465211":"〔二次分析〕に当たり、東京大学社会科学研究所附属社会調査・データアーカイブ研究センターSSJデータアーカイブから〔「本人訴訟に関する調査，2011」(司法研修所)〕の個票データの提供を受けました。The data for this secondary analysis, \"Survey on Personal Lawsuits, 2011 of the survey, Legal Training and Research Institute of the depositor,\" was provided by the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archives,Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo.","subitem_1586228490356":"ja"},{"subitem_1586228465211":"When publishing the results of the secondary analysis of SSJDA dataset(s), I shall acknowledge the data source by citing as follows: The data for this secondary analysis, \"Survey on Personal Lawsuits, 2011 of the survey, Legal Training and Research Institute of the depositor,\" was provided by the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archives, Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo.Note: When publishing the results of the analysis of JGSS dataset(s), I shall acknowledge the data source by copying and pasting the citation found in the \"Readme\" file included with my dataset(s).","subitem_1586228490356":"en"}]},"item_1593074267803":{"attribute_name":"Author","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"司法研修所","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorNameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1600078832557":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"url":{"label":"https://ssjda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Direct/gaiyo.php?eid=0874"}},{"url":{"label":"https://ssjda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Direct/gaiyo.php?lang=eng&eid=0874"}}]},"item_1602145007095":{"attribute_name":"URI","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602144759036":"https://ssjda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Direct/gaiyo.php?eid=0874"},{"subitem_1602144759036":"https://ssjda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Direct/gaiyo.php?lang=eng&eid=0874"}]},"item_1602145192334":{"attribute_name":"Time P","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602144573160":"2011","subitem_1602144578572":"ja","subitem_1602144587621":"start"},{"subitem_1602144573160":"2011","subitem_1602144578572":"ja","subitem_1602144587621":"end"}]},"item_1602145817646":{"attribute_name":"Fund","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602142815328":"ja"}]},"item_1602147887655":{"attribute_name":"provider","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602143328410":"司法研修所","subitem_1602143330068":"ja"},{"subitem_1602143328410":"Legal Training and Research Institute","subitem_1602143330068":"en"}]},"item_title":"Survey on Personal Lawsuits, 2011","item_type_id":"20","owner":"1","path":["1613031614318"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2024-07-21"},"publish_date":"2024-07-21","publish_status":"0","recid":"43642","relation_version_is_last":true,"resourcetype":{"attribute_name":"ResourceType","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"dataset","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_ddb1"}]},"title":["Survey on Personal Lawsuits, 2011"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2024-08-19T00:50:19.223426+00:00"}