{"created":"2024-03-18T00:40:31.811986+00:00","id":43705,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"c5dd0734-322e-462b-84fc-d95dba32ac6f"},"_deposit":{"id":"43705","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"43705"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:jdcat.jsps.go.jp:00043705","sets":["1613031614318"]},"author_link":[],"item_1551264308487":{"attribute_name":" タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1551255647225":"企業福利厚生制度の現状と課題・方向性，2006","subitem_1551255648112":"ja"},{"subitem_1551255647225":"The Present State, Problems with, and Direction of Companies' Benefit and Welfare Systems, 2006","subitem_1551255648112":"en"}]},"item_1551264629907":{"attribute_name":"Lisence","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602213569986":"https://csrda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/access/condition/","subitem_1602213570623":"ja"},{"subitem_1602213569986":"https://csrda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/access/condition/","subitem_1602213570623":"en"}]},"item_1551264822581":{"attribute_name":"Topic","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1592472785169":"労使関係・争議","subitem_1592472785698":"ja","subitem_1592472786088":"CESSDATopic","subitem_1592472786560":"https://vocabularies.cessda.eu/urn/urn:ddi:int.cessda.cv:TopicClassification"},{"subitem_1592472785169":"労働条件","subitem_1592472785698":"ja","subitem_1592472786088":"CESSDATopic","subitem_1592472786560":"https://vocabularies.cessda.eu/urn/urn:ddi:int.cessda.cv:TopicClassification"},{"subitem_1592472785169":"Labour relations/conflict","subitem_1592472785698":"en","subitem_1592472786088":"CESSDATopic","subitem_1592472786560":"https://vocabularies.cessda.eu/urn/urn:ddi:int.cessda.cv:TopicClassification"},{"subitem_1592472785169":"Working conditions","subitem_1592472785698":"en","subitem_1592472786088":"CESSDATopic","subitem_1592472786560":"https://vocabularies.cessda.eu/urn/urn:ddi:int.cessda.cv:TopicClassification"}]},"item_1551264846237":{"attribute_name":"Desc","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1551255577890":"先進国の多くは現在，資源，環境，人口といった重たい成長制約を抱えている。国内市場の量的拡大はそれほど期待できなくなり，そのかわりに，人件費の効率や労働生産性の優劣が企業の競争力を大きく左右するようになった。わが国企業の人事・労務担当者あるいは労働組合幹部の多くは，人件費の効率化を進めながらも従業員福祉向上の要請に応え続けるという簡単には解決のつかない課題に直面している。\n\n 　雇用の流動化等を通じた人件費の効率化は，短期には労働分配率を引き下げて収支を改善する効果が期待できるものの，中長期には人的資本投資の減退を通じて労働生産性を押し下げるリスクを内包している。さらに，福利厚生費が適正水準を下回って効率化された場合には，社員の生活支援の後退が懸念されるばかりではなく，モラルダウンやメンタルヘルスを含めた心身の健康支援施策の後退を通じて，やはり労働生産性を損なう原因となりかねない。福利厚生費のコスト管理は進めながらも，生産性の向上に資する施策の効用は正しく認識して必要に応じて拡充していく姿勢が求められているのではないだろうか。\n\n 　本調査は，こうした問題意識の下，わが国の福利厚生の現状・課題について企業と従業員を対象に実施されたインターネットによるアンケート調査であり，今後のあるべき方向性を探ったものである。主な調査項目は，人事・労務管理施策等／福利厚生制度／「仕事と生活の調和」支援制度／社会保障・企業福利厚生制度・自助努力の役割比重／任意加入型の生活保障制度等である。\n\n 　本調査の特色は次のとおり。\n1.企業調査と従業員調査を並行して実施。同じテーマについて両調査の結果を対比できる。\n2.企業調査は企業の福利厚生担当者が回答。企業の従業員規模，業種ごとの分析が可能。\n3.従業員調査は，正規従業員，非正規従業員それぞれの分析が可能。\n4.非正規従業員の標本は，パート・アルバイト社員（派遣，請負社員等は除く）。\n5.福利厚生制度に加えて「仕事と生活の調和」支援制度についても調査。\n6.総務省の「事業所・企業統計調査」を用いて母集団の代表性を補完。","subitem_1551255592625":"ja"},{"subitem_1551255577890":"Many advanced countries are presently facing heavy development constraints in the form of resources, the environment, and population. As a result, they have little expectation of quantitative expansion of their domestic markets and, instead, find their corporate competitiveness greatly affected by loss of labor efficiency and productivity. This means that personnel and labor managers in Japanese corporations and labor leaders face a problem that cannot be easily resolved: how to continue meeting demand for improvement in employee welfare while also seeking greater labor efficiency.\n\nIncreasing labor efficiency through means such as employment fluidity is expected to effectively reduce labor’s share and improve income and expenditure in the short term, but it inherently risks medium- to long-term suppression of labor productivity through decline in human capital investment. Furthermore, if welfare expenses are streamlined by reducing them below appropriate levels, not only is there concern of decreased support for the lives of employees but this may also ultimately cause a loss in labor productivity due to reduced morale and measures supporting mental and physical health. Thus, it appears that an approach is being sought in which cost management of welfare expenses is pursued while properly recognizing the usefulness of measures contributing to improved productivity and enhancing them as necessary.\n\nThis survey is an online survey of corporations and employees on the present state and issues facing welfare in Japan, with awareness of the above problems and exploration of possible future directions. The main survey items are personnel management and labor relations measures, etc./welfare systems/“work-life” balance support systems/relative weight of social security, corporate welfare systems and self-sufficiency efforts/voluntary enrollment in life security systems, etc.\n\nThe characteristics of this survey are as follows.\n1. A corporate survey and employee survey conducted in parallel. Both surveys are on the same theme, and the results thereof can be contrasted.\n2. The corporate survey consists of responses from corporate welfare managers. It can be analyzed per corporate size by number of employees and industry.\n3. The employee survey allows for respective analysis of regular employees and non-regular employees.\n4. Sampling of non-regular employees consists of part-timers/casual part-timers (arubaito) (excluding dispatched (haken) workers and subcontractors, etc.).\n5. The survey also covers “work-life balance” support systems, in addition to welfare systems.\n6. The representativeness of populations is supplemented using the “Establishment and Enterprise Census of Japan” of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.","subitem_1551255592625":"en"}]},"item_1551264917614":{"attribute_name":"publisher","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1551255702686":"SSJデータアーカイブ","subitem_1551255710277":"ja"},{"subitem_1551255702686":"SSJDA","subitem_1551255710277":"en"}]},"item_1551265002099":{"attribute_name":"Lang","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1551255818386":"jpn"}]},"item_1551265075370":{"attribute_name":"Version","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1591254914934":"1","subitem_1591254915406":"ja","subitem_1591254915862":"2009-03-27"}]},"item_1570068313185":{"attribute_name":"Geo","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1586419454219":"北海道","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"宮城県","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"埼玉県","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"千葉県","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"東京都","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"神奈川県","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"静岡県","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"愛知県","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"京都府","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"大阪府","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"兵庫県","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"広島県","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"福岡県","subitem_1586419462229":"ja"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"hokkaido","subitem_1586419462229":"en"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"miyagi","subitem_1586419462229":"en"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"saitama","subitem_1586419462229":"en"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"chiba","subitem_1586419462229":"en"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"tokyo","subitem_1586419462229":"en"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"kanagawa","subitem_1586419462229":"en"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"shizuoka","subitem_1586419462229":"en"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"aichi","subitem_1586419462229":"en"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"kyoto","subitem_1586419462229":"en"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"osaka","subitem_1586419462229":"en"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"hyogo","subitem_1586419462229":"en"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"hiroshima","subitem_1586419462229":"en"},{"subitem_1586419454219":"fukuoka","subitem_1586419462229":"en"}]},"item_1586157591881":{"attribute_name":"Study ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1586156939407":"0549","subitem_1586311767281":"ja","subitem_1591256665864":"SSJデータアーカイブ"},{"subitem_1586156939407":"10.34500/SSJDA.0549","subitem_1586311767281":"ja","subitem_1591256665864":"DOI"},{"subitem_1586156939407":"0549","subitem_1586311767281":"en","subitem_1591256665864":"SSJDA"}]},"item_1586253152753":{"attribute_name":"Date of C","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602144573160":"2006-12-25","subitem_1602144578572":"ja","subitem_1602144587621":"start"},{"subitem_1602144573160":"2006-12-27","subitem_1602144578572":"ja","subitem_1602144587621":"end"}]},"item_1586253224033":{"attribute_name":"UoA","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1596608607860":"個人","subitem_1596608609366":"ja"},{"subitem_1596608607860":"組織","subitem_1596608609366":"ja"},{"subitem_1596608607860":"Individual","subitem_1596608609366":"en"},{"subitem_1596608607860":"Organization","subitem_1596608609366":"en"}]},"item_1586253249552":{"attribute_name":"Universe","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1596608974429":"[企業調査]\n　正規従業員5人以上の民間企業の人事・(総務)・労務担当者でその部門で「福利厚生」に関する業務について決定権があり半年以上経験がある人（経営者，役員，正規従業員）\n[従業員調査]\n　下記調査地域に本社がある正規従業員5人以上の企業に勤めている正規従業員／非正規従業員\n\n※本調査における正規従業員とは，事前調査にて，雇用形態を経営者・役員または正社員と回答した方。\n※本調査における非正規従業員とは，事前調査にて，雇用形態をパート・アルバイトと回答した方（派遣社員は含まれない）。","subitem_1596608975087":"ja"},{"subitem_1596608974429":"[Corporate survey]\nHuman resource (general affairs) /labor relations managers at private corporations with five or more regular employees having decision-making authority over the administration of “welfare” in their departments and a half-year or more experience of relevant work (managers, executive officers, regular employees)\n[Employee survey]\nRegular employees/non-regular employees working at corporations with five or more regular employees and having headquarters offices in survey areas listed below.\n\n*In this survey, “regular employees” are people responding in a preliminary survey that they are managers, officers or regular employees.\n*In this survey, “non-regular employees” are people responding in a preliminary survey that their employment status as part-time/casual part-time (arubaito) (dispatched workers (haken shain) are not included).","subitem_1596608975087":"en"}]},"item_1586253334588":{"attribute_name":"Sampling P","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1596609826487":"非確率: クオータ抽出","subitem_1596609827068":"ja"},{"subitem_1596609826487":"Non-probability: Quota","subitem_1596609827068":"en"}]},"item_1586253349308":{"attribute_name":"CollM","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1596610500817":"自記式調査票：Webベース（CAWI）","subitem_1596610501381":"ja"},{"subitem_1596610500817":"Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)","subitem_1596610501381":"en"}]},"item_1586253589529":{"attribute_name":"Sampling R","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1596609826487":"有効回収数      （補正後）        （補正前）\n   [企業調査]    1,504サンプル      1,647サンプル\n  [従業員調査]  2,972サンプル      2,972サンプル\n※企業調査のサンプルが補正前後で異なる点については、下記調査方法を参照のこと。","subitem_1596609827068":"ja"},{"subitem_1596609826487":"\n\nNumber of valid responses\n(after correction)\n(before correction)\n\n\n[Corporate survey]\n1,504\n1,647\n\n\n[Employee survey]\n2,972\n2,972\n\n\n*Refer to the survey method below for any differences in corporate survey sample size before and after correction.","subitem_1596609827068":"en"}]},"item_1588260046718":{"attribute_name":"Data K","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1591178807921":"量的調査: ミクロデータ","subitem_1591178808409":"ja","subitem_1592380784883":"Other"},{"subitem_1591178807921":"quantitative research: micro data","subitem_1591178808409":"en","subitem_1592380784883":"Other"}]},"item_1588260178185":{"attribute_name":"Access_e","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1522650717957":"ja","subitem_1522650727486":"制約付きアクセス"},{"subitem_1522650717957":"en","subitem_1522650727486":"restricted access"}]},"item_1592405734122":{"attribute_name":"Distributor","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1591320889728":"SSJDA","subitem_1591320890384":"Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo","subitem_1591320914113":"https://csrda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ssjda/","subitem_1591320918354":"Distributor","subitem_1592369405220":"SSJ データアーカイブ","subitem_1592369407829":"ja"},{"subitem_1591320889728":"SSJDA","subitem_1591320890384":"Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo","subitem_1591320914113":"https://csrda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/ssjda/","subitem_1591320918354":"Distributor","subitem_1592369405220":"SSJDA","subitem_1592369407829":"en"}]},"item_1592405735401":{"attribute_name":"Related P","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602214559588":"ja","subitem_1602214560358":"https://ssjda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Direct/resultsearch.php?lang=jpn&eid=0549"},{"subitem_1602214559588":"en","subitem_1602214560358":"https://ssjda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Direct/resultsearch.php?lang=eng&eid=0549"}]},"item_1592880868902":{"attribute_name":"Bib","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1586228465211":"〔二次分析〕に当たり、東京大学社会科学研究所附属社会調査・データアーカイブ研究センターSSJデータアーカイブから〔「企業福利厚生制度の現状と課題・方向性，2006」(明治安田生活福祉研究所)〕の個票データの提供を受けました。The data for this secondary analysis, \"The Present State, Problems with, and Direction of Companies' Benefit and Welfare Systems, 2006 of the survey, Meiji Yasuda Institute of Life and Wellness, Inc. of the depositor,\" was provided by the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archives,Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo.","subitem_1586228490356":"ja"},{"subitem_1586228465211":"When publishing the results of the secondary analysis of SSJDA dataset(s), I shall acknowledge the data source by citing as follows: The data for this secondary analysis, \"The Present State, Problems with, and Direction of Companies' Benefit and Welfare Systems, 2006 of the survey, Meiji Yasuda Institute of Life and Wellness, Inc. of the depositor,\" was provided by the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archives, Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo.Note: When publishing the results of the analysis of JGSS dataset(s), I shall acknowledge the data source by copying and pasting the citation found in the \"Readme\" file included with my dataset(s).","subitem_1586228490356":"en"}]},"item_1593074267803":{"attribute_name":"Author","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"（株）明治安田生活福祉研究所，実査は(株)マクロミル","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"Meiji Yasuda Research Institute, Inc., survey carried out by Macromill, Inc.","creatorNameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1600078832557":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"url":{"label":"https://ssjda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Direct/gaiyo.php?eid=0549"}},{"url":{"label":"https://ssjda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Direct/gaiyo.php?lang=eng&eid=0549"}}]},"item_1602145007095":{"attribute_name":"URI","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602144759036":"https://ssjda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Direct/gaiyo.php?eid=0549"},{"subitem_1602144759036":"https://ssjda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Direct/gaiyo.php?lang=eng&eid=0549"}]},"item_1602145192334":{"attribute_name":"Time P","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602144573160":"2006","subitem_1602144578572":"ja","subitem_1602144587621":"start"},{"subitem_1602144573160":"2006","subitem_1602144578572":"ja","subitem_1602144587621":"end"}]},"item_1602145817646":{"attribute_name":"Fund","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602142815328":"ja"}]},"item_1602147887655":{"attribute_name":"provider","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_1602143328410":"明治安田総合研究所","subitem_1602143330068":"ja"},{"subitem_1602143328410":"Meiji Yasuda Research Institute, Inc.","subitem_1602143330068":"en"}]},"item_title":"The Present State, Problems with, and Direction of Companies' Benefit and Welfare Systems, 2006","item_type_id":"20","owner":"1","path":["1613031614318"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2024-07-21"},"publish_date":"2024-07-21","publish_status":"0","recid":"43705","relation_version_is_last":true,"resourcetype":{"attribute_name":"ResourceType","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"dataset","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_ddb1"}]},"title":["The Present State, Problems with, and Direction of Companies' Benefit and Welfare Systems, 2006"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2024-08-19T00:53:39.464566+00:00"}